New Age of Public Relations
The University of Wisconsin-Stout, my alma mater, has come under fire recently after controversial actions of the University Police and administration. It all started when a theater professor hung a poster containing some mildly threatening language on his door leading University Police to remove the poster. I won’t completely recount the actions by university officials here, but you can read more about it to give yourself more context:
The story quickly garnered buzz on the Internet when FIRE became involved. FIRE defines their mission as this:
The mission of FIRE is to defend and sustain individual rights at America’s colleges and universities. These rights include freedom of speech, legal equality, due process, religious liberty, and sanctity of conscience — the essential qualities of individual liberty and dignity. FIRE’s core mission is to protect the unprotected and to educate the public and communities of concerned Americans about the threats to these rights on our campuses and about the means to preserve them.
After FIRE issued a press release the Interwebs began buzzing about peoples concern with UW-Stout’s action. Many feel that UW-Stout is engaging in censorship and denying the professor his constitutional right of freedom of speech. So how did UW-Stout respond to this criticism?
UW-Stout has done little to state their position and give reasoning behind their removal of the poster in the public sphere. Doug Mell, University Communications Director, did give statements to local news media on their position. The Chancellor’s office also composed a short e-mail to UW-Stout faculty, staff and students which you can read here. I haven’t seen anything on their official Facebook and Twitter accounts, no blogs or open letters posted on their website. There has been no presence on blogs which have been covering the story. Blogs like: Popehat, EthicsAlarm, The Huffington Post, Gawker, theOnion‘s AV Club and Reason.com. Even stars of the show Firefly (the show the poster centered around), Adam Baldwin and Nathan Fillion, have made comments on the actions of the university via Twitter. Conversations are evolving every day about the issue and the university continues to remain silent in terms of engaging the digital realm. Take a look at this chart which analyzes top words used in conjunction with “UW-Stout” on Twitter today:

Click to Enlarge
You can’t afford to ignore the digital sphere, especially when engaging in the conversation has never been easier. All this content being generated isn’t going anywhere. It will be read and shared at warp speed. It will be archived by Google for decades to come, if not indefinitely. When current and prospective students search for information on UW-Stout in the future they’ll likely find this content. You can’t hide, you can’t ignore it. It’s occurring whether you’re engaging it or not, so you might as well be in there addressing concerns and fostering honest discussion. I speculate there is one glaring reason that is not occurring.
UW-Stout stance seems to be dug in for the long haul. They made this decision and took the actions they did and now feel they have to stand behind that action. This is the wrong way to go about it. It’s hard to have effective public relations this day and age when you’re still committed to the wrong actions. Brands have become personalized with the advent of social media. People feel closer than ever to a logo. Now more than ever doing the right thing is the right thing. The days of public relations officials burying stories and public sediment are long gone. You can’t take that approach.
If UW-Stout wants to save face they should begin engaging alumni and others on Twitter, Blogs, Facebook etc. It’s part public relations and part marketing. Publicize UW-Stout’s intent to organize a university-wide open forum where students, faculty and administrators are encouraged to attend. Let members of the crowd speak to a panel including Chancellor Charles W. Sorensen, Chief of Police Lisa Walter, Professor James Miller and perhaps a few others. Listen to peoples voices and really consider what their concerns are. After a few days make a public statement in every possible way, including YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, press releases etc. that there was an overreaction and rush to action. Back your way out of this by doing the right things: fostering honest discussion, engaging the community you serve. If you do the right thing, public disdain and outrage would quickly subside and you turn a negative into an overwhelmingly positive.
I’d be a huge, huge fan of Chancellor Sorensen taping a YouTube apology and explanation similar to how Domino’s CEO Patrick Doyle handled a public relations nightmare a few years ago. It really puts a face to the issue and that face should be Chancellor Sorensen, not any member of the communications department.
I hope my alma mater really considers a strategy to back their way out of this one. It’s my personal opinion that there was an overreaction by university officials. Having worked with UW-Stout for four years, I know they have the best intentions of providing a safe, secure and inviting campus enviornment. Calling university officials fascists is going too far, but I can understand the knee-jerk reaction by some when emotions run high. Please UW-Stout, don’t be afraid to admit you made a mistake. It will cause far more damage holding to your initial position then offering a simple apology and turning this negative into a learning experience and positive for everyone involved.
UW-Stout reversed their stance on this issue 24 hours after this blog was first published. They utilized Facebook and Twitter in their response. This was their first use of social media platforms on the issue. You can read their statement on this WEAU news story.
Matt graduated magna cum laude from the University of Wisconsin-Stout in 2011 with a B.S. in Information & Communication Technologies. He spent three years as a Digital Media Specialist in the Student Life Services department during his undergraduate studies. You can contact him here.